Macroeconomic Indicators & Trends

July 07, 2026

AI Exposure: Alarming in Name, Shaky in Substance

About the Author
avatar
Torsten Slok

Partner, Chief Economist

Share

Everyone talks about AI exposure in the labor market, but the reality is that there is no consensus about what this means.

This is illustrated by the five measures currently used in studies quantifying the impact of AI on the labor market:

  1. One measure counts what people in each job actually do with Claude, using real chat logs to see which work tasks are being handed to AI.
  2. Another does the same with Microsoft Copilot to see what those users lean on AI for.
  3. A third skips usage entirely and has human experts judge which job skills AI is theoretically capable of doing, whether or not anyone is using it that way.
  4. A fourth asks ChatGPT to grade its own usefulness on each task in a job, essentially letting AI predict where it could help.
  5. A fifth scans millions of employer job postings for mentions of AI, treating demand for AI skills as a sign of how exposed a role is.

"What could AI do to this job?" and "What are workers actually using AI for?" are not the same question, and the theoretical measures (3, 4 and 5) run systematically higher than the usage-based ones (1 and 2) because they ignore whether adoption is even happening or worth the cost.

As a result, many occupations look highly exposed under one measure and barely touched under another.

What is most striking is that the five measures disagree most exactly where the stakes are highest, among the very jobs everyone wants to flag as at-risk, such as telemarketers, tax preparers and writers.

The bottom line is that when someone says a job is "highly exposed to AI," the honest first question is: Exposed by which measure, and measuring what? Until that is pinned down, the label "AI exposure" carries far less meaning than it appears to.

My colleague Sania Edlich and I will dig further into this in upcoming Sparks.

Download high-res chart


This presentation may not be distributed, transmitted or otherwise communicated to others in whole or in part without the express consent of Apollo Global Management, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”).

Apollo makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the statements made during this presentation, including, but not limited to, statements obtained from third parties. Opinions, estimates and projections constitute the current judgment of the speaker as of the date indicated. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Apollo and are subject to change at any time without notice. Apollo does not have any responsibility to update this presentation to account for such changes. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed during this presentation will continue.

Statements made throughout this presentation are not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice and do not constitute an investment recommendation or investment advice. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information discussed during this presentation, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. Apollo does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients. This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any security, product or service, including interest in any investment product or fund or account managed or advised by Apollo.

Certain statements made throughout this presentation may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.