When building a strategic private markets allocation, the waiting period can carry a meaningful cost. The question is not only how to access private markets, but how to manage uncalled capital during the ramp-up period.
As investors incorporate private markets allocations in their portfolios, many do so through traditional closed-end drawdown funds. While that structure can offer access to attractive long-term opportunities, it can also introduce an often-overlooked challenge: committed capital is not invested capital.
Instead, capital is called when portfolio company investments are made, typically during the early years of a fund’s life, with distributions generally beginning later. The result is the familiar J-curve, highlighted in the chart below. Looking at vintages from 2000 to 2020, on average, buyout private equity funds took four years to reach the “bottom” of the J-curve, at which point the fund is ~50% net called on a cash flow basis (cumulative capital calls minus cumulative distributions). After seven years, these funds have on average turned cash flow positive, though the time horizon has ranged from ~4-10 years.
We view the J-curve as not only a fund-level phenomenon, but a portfolio construction issue.
The J-Curve Effect Is a Total Portfolio Problem
Consider a traditional 60/40 portfolio that seeks to build a 10% allocation to private markets. Using a drawdown model, the portfolio could have very little private market exposure for several years and require multiple vintage year commitments to reach the target allocation.
Different Paths to Building Private Market Allocations
As investors build private markets exposure, they must forecast cash flows and contend with the uncertainty of when and how much capital may get called, in addition to when and how capital may be distributed back. During the holding period, uncalled committed capital can be an important driver of portfolio outcomes.
The table below outlines three different approaches to managing that capital. Some investors may prioritize speed in reaching private markets exposure targets, while others may prioritize potential cumulative portfolio gains relative to a traditional 60/40 baseline.
Holding uncalled cash is simple, but costly as it will earn little to no return. A second approach seeks to reduce cash drag without changing the overall portfolio mix: commit to drawdown funds, but keep uncalled capital invested in a balanced 50/50 stock-bond portfolio (reallocating 5% from both equities and fixed income to transition from 60/40 to 55/35/10). In effect, this allows the investor to maintain the broader 60/40 allocation while waiting for private fund capital calls.
This drawdown + 50/50 approach may improve cumulative returns relative to holding uncalled capital in cash, particularly if public markets are performing well. It also avoids a cash drag in the portfolio while the private markets exposure builds. However, it does not solve the core implementation issue: the investor still reaches their target private markets exposure over a longer time period and the capital reserved for future commitments may be susceptible to volatility in public markets. That may create timing risk if capital calls coincide with a drawdown in equities or rate-sensitive fixed income.
In our view, the most efficient way to mitigate the J-curve of drawdown funds is to pair that exposure with perpetual private market funds. Capital can be put to work in private markets sooner, potentially shortening the time needed to reach target allocation and reducing the drag associated with uncalled capital sitting in low-yielding instruments. Relative to a drawdown-only approach, perpetual structures may also smooth the implementation path by replacing a staggered funding schedule with more immediate deployment.
Blending Drawdown and Perpetual Fund
For investors moving beyond the traditional 60/40 portfolio, the challenge is not just deciding to invest in private markets, but how to do so efficiently.
Traditional drawdown funds do not offer immediate private markets exposure, which means a portfolio may remain meaningfully under allocated even after the commitment has been made. A blended approach combining drawdown and perpetual funds can close that gap more efficiently, though the success of this approach depends on the characteristics of the perpetual strategy itself.
In this context, we believe that the most effective perpetual allocations help capital remain productive without becoming a new source of instability within the portfolio. This includes strategies with shorter durations, lower historical volatility, limited correlation to traditional asset classes and a return profile grounded in income generation and contractual cash flows.
Paired with traditional drawdown funds, we believe select perpetual strategies can reduce cash drag, shorten the path to target allocation and align exposures closer to the investor’s intended allocation.
Tags
Related Insights
3:12
All information contained in this material is as of May 2026 unless otherwise indicated. This material is for informational purposes only and should not be treated as research. This material should not be copied, distributed, published, or reproduced, in whole or in part, or disclosed by any recipient to any other person without the express written consent of Apollo Global Management, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”).
The views and opinions expressed in this material are the views and opinions of Apollo Analysts. They may not reflect the views and opinions of Apollo and are subject to change at any time without notice. Further, Apollo and its affiliates may have positions (long or short) or engage in securities transactions that are not consistent with the information and views expressed in this material. There can be no assurance that an investment strategy will be successful. Target allocations contained in this material are subject to change. There is no assurance that the target allocations will be achieved, and actual allocations may be significantly different than that shown here. This material does not constitute an offer of any service or product of Apollo. It is not an invitation by or on behalf of Apollo to any person to buy or sell any security or to adopt any investment strategy, and shall not form the basis of, nor may it accompany nor form part of, any right or contract to buy or sell any security or to adopt any investment strategy. Nothing in this material should be taken as investment advice or a recommendation to enter into any transaction.
Hyperlinks to third-party websites in this material are provided for reader convenience only. There can be no assurances that any of the trends described in this material will continue or will not reverse. Past events and trends do not imply, predict or guarantee, and are not necessarily indicative of future events or results. Unless otherwise noted, information included in this material is presented as of the dates indicated. This material is not complete and the information contained in this material may change at any time without notice. Apollo does not have any responsibility to update the material to account for such changes. Apollo has not made any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to fairness, correctness, accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the information contained in this material (including but not limited to information obtained from third parties unrelated to Apollo), and expressly disclaims any responsibility or liability thereof. The information contained in this material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice or investment recommendations. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information contained in this material, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. Apollo does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients.
Certain information contained in this material may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such information. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.
Investing involves risk including loss of principal. Alternative investments often are speculative, typically have higher fees than traditional investments often include a high degree of risk and are appropriate only for eligible long-term investors who are willing to forgo liquidity and put capital at risk for an indefinite period of time. They may be highly illiquid and can engage in leverage and other speculative practices that may increase volatility and risk of loss.
This material may reference trade names, trademarks, or service marks of companies that are not owned by Apollo or Apollo funds, or that may be held as investments by Apollo or one or more Apollo funds. The use or display of these companies’ trade names, trademarks, or service marks is not intended to imply any relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of Apollo, by such companies. All company names and logos are trademarks of their respective holders.
Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.
Additional information may be available upon request.
© 2026 Apollo Global Management, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
