Macroeconomic Indicators & Trends

October 03, 2026

Robots Are Not Coming for Your Job

About the Author
avatar
Torsten Slok

Partner, Chief Economist

Share

This new paper from Anthropic finds that robots will only be able to replace 300,000 jobs in the US economy. For comparison, total employment in the US economy is 160 million. Even under aggressive projections, widespread displacement of physical labor will take decades, and historical cost decline rates suggest it would take 40 years to reach cost parity for even 10% of jobs.

Consider nursing and general repair, where present-day robots can do almost none of the work, or the electrician threading cable through a finished wall and the home health aide lifting a frail patient, tasks that look routine to an outsider and remain close to untouchable in practice.

In fact, much of the automation that will arrive this decade has nothing to do with large language models. Car washes that scan vehicles to aim their sprayers, warehouse sortation lines and autonomous vehicles all descend from sensing and control work that was well underway before large language models arrived and would almost certainly have happened anyway.

The bottom line is that the hardest physical work is harder to automate than the consensus assumes, and the automation we do get will owe more to decades of mechanical engineering than to the current moment in AI. Almost all jobs are bundles of simple and complicated tasks, so robots that can handle the simple part still cannot do the job, which is why, for the vast majority of workers, the mess is the moat.

For investors, the conclusion is that job losses in the economy will be modest, held back by cost, by the fine manipulation robots cannot manage, by regulation and by a simple human preference for human hands.

Displacement of workers is also only one side of the ledger. US business formation stands at the highest level in the nation's history, new firms are where new jobs come from and the net effect on employment is likely to be positive by a wide margin.

The conclusion is that robots are not coming for your job, because very few jobs are a single automatable task. In other words, your job is a mess.


This presentation may not be distributed, transmitted or otherwise communicated to others in whole or in part without the express consent of Apollo Global Management, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”).

Apollo makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the statements made during this presentation, including, but not limited to, statements obtained from third parties. Opinions, estimates and projections constitute the current judgment of the speaker as of the date indicated. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Apollo and are subject to change at any time without notice. Apollo does not have any responsibility to update this presentation to account for such changes. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed during this presentation will continue.

Statements made throughout this presentation are not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice and do not constitute an investment recommendation or investment advice. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information discussed during this presentation, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. Apollo does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients. This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any security, product or service, including interest in any investment product or fund or account managed or advised by Apollo.

Certain statements made throughout this presentation may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.