How Alternatives Can Address Your 60/40 Portfolio Blues
July 24, 2022
How Alternatives Can Address Your 60/40 Portfolio Blues
Share
About the Author
Matt O'Mara
Partner
About the Author
Matt O'Mara
Partner
Share
Individual investors have long been told that a diversified portfolio of public equities and bonds is the key to a successful retirement plan. While that held true for a long time—the mantra is now being challenged.
Download Whitepaper
Key Takeaways
The end of a 14-year-long period of monetary expansion, a declining number of publicly traded companies, increased concentration of risk, rising correlations, stiff competition, and scarcity of opportunities for excess returns have all coalesced to diminish the opportunity set for investors in public markets.
How can investors address this challenge? As private markets continue to grow, we believe that investors should rethink their strategic asset allocation frameworks to add or increase the use of alternatives in their portfolios to curb volatility and seek to enhance potential risk-adjusted returns.
We define “alternatives” as simply an alternative to publicly traded stocks and bonds that seeks excess returns per unit of risk at every point along the risk-reward spectrum, from investment-grade credit to equity.
Seen through that prism, we believe that it becomes clear that investors can explore the risk spectrum in private markets similarly to public markets. A key differentiating element is liquidity. We believe that investors who can forgo some level of liquidity stand to benefit from the opportunity in alternatives.
The fixed income playbook is changing with the rate selloff. Portfolios built in a different rate environment may be carrying a rate bet they didn't know they had. Duration has stopped working. Apollo's Ben Trombley breaks down why rates are staying higher for longer — and what investors should do about it.
UK DB pension schemes are better funded than at any point in a generation. Rising gilt yields since 2022 have sharply reduced the present value of liabilities, and years of derisking and strong prior returns have left the aggregate funded position at its strongest in decades. For most schemes we believe the strategic question is no longer how to close a deficit, but how to protect that hard-won position through the endgame, whether that means an insurance buyout or long-term run-on. In both cases the task is the same: to convert the funded position into a portfolio that reliably pays pension cashflows as they fall due, at the lowest cost in capital and risk.
Corporate pensions are better funded and more fixed income–oriented than ever, and with LDI now widespread, fixed income composition has become increasingly consequential. Apollo Partner Brian Weinstein explores how tight spreads and crowded returns have pushed sponsors beyond public IG into diversifying credit anchored by private placements and real estate financing. Private IG extends this further, tapping higher-quality privately originated assets to improve diversification, income and surplus outcomes while preserving hedge efficacy.